SYSTEM/LIVE // FRACTIONAL CTO · PRACTICE OF LAW // EST_2026

Strategic
technology
leadership for
law firms

Ship a private AI workstation in six weeks. Modernize the practice without vendor lock-in. Audit every tool the firm pays for — with no referral fees, ever. ABA Rule 1.6 by architecture.

The most urgent technology decision your firm makes this year is about AI — and most firms are about to make it wrong.

A SaaS that ships your client's discovery to a third-party server is not a productivity tool. It is future Bar complaint dressed in a monthly subscription.

Every major legal AI vendor processes your case files on their infrastructure. Their privacy policy is your malpractice exposure. Their breach is your ABA Model Rule 1.6 violation. Their training-data clause — if you read it — quietly waives the very confidentiality you owe your client.

Meanwhile, your associates are pasting privileged work into ChatGPT anyway, because the alternative is staying late. The risk is already inside the firm. The only question is whether you address it before discovery does.

There is a better path. The technology to run capable AI entirely on a partner's own machine has existed for a year. What's missing is a CTO who understands both the engineering and the ethics rules. That is the gap I fill.

// ADOPTION_RATE 98% of firms use AI in some form — most through tools their managing partner has never reviewed.
// LIABILITY_VECTOR 1.6 ABA Model Rule that governs every paste into a third-party AI tool. Exposure is not theoretical.
// MARGINAL_COST $0 per query when AI runs on hardware you already own. ROI is not the problem.
// TIME_TO_SHIP 6wk from kickoff to a partner using a private AI workstation in production. Fixed scope, fixed price.

A complete CTO function. Without the partner-track salary line.

// id // domain // description // status
CAP_01 AI Systems & Deployment Local-first AI for privileged work. Retrieval, citation, audit log, ACP-safe by architecture. SHIPPED
CAP_02 Practice Modernization Migration off legacy stacks. Practice management, document management, billing, e-signature. ACTIVE
CAP_03 Vendor Diligence Independent evaluation of every tool the firm pays for. No referral fees, no kickbacks, ever. ACTIVE
CAP_04 Security & Compliance ABA Rule 1.6 / 5.3 oversight. Encryption, breach response, SOC 2 readiness, retention policy. ACTIVE
CAP_05 Cloud & Infrastructure AWS, Azure, on-prem, hybrid. Cost optimization, disaster recovery, business continuity planning. ACTIVE
CAP_06 Custom Integrations The Clio → QuickBooks → DocuSign → calendar work nobody on staff can build. ACTIVE
CAP_07 Engineering Hiring Technical interviews, reference calls, comp benchmarking. Stop hiring the wrong developers. ACTIVE
CAP_08 Strategic Roadmap Three-year hardware, software, security plan. Annual review. Tied to firm growth model. ACTIVE

Three ways we work. One operator through every line.

// SVC_0 · START_HERE

Diagnostic — Get Clear

A 90-minute call to audit your current technology, AI exposure, and roadmap. Written 10-page report delivered within 5 business days. The full $1,500 counts toward any retainer signed within 30 days.

$1,500 one-time  ·  credited if you engage book_diagnostic() →
SVC_B · PROJECT_ENGAGEMENT

Bespoke Build & Modernization

// for firms with a specific problem on the calendar

Custom systems, infrastructure overhauls, vendor migrations — scoped, fixed-price, weekly demos. Nothing handed off to a junior.

  • Two-week discovery + architecture phase
  • Six-to-twelve week build with weekly demos
  • Custom AI, integrations, workflows, full stack rebuilds
  • Hosted on your infrastructure or mine, your call
  • Full source code + documentation handover
$24k starting  ·  scoped per build
SVC_C · STRATEGIC_RETAINER

Fractional CTO Engagement

// for firms that need CTO function w/o headcount

Standing technical leadership across every domain that touches the firm's technology — AI policy, cloud bill, next hire, all of it.

  • Weekly strategy call + standing async access
  • Vendor evaluations, contract reviews, RFP oversight
  • Engineering-hire interviews + reference calls
  • Annual security audit + roadmap to partners
  • M&A technology diligence when applicable
  • Direct contact — no junior, no handoff
$9,500 / month  ·  quarterly review

How does Knight CTO compare to Harvey, CoCounsel, or hiring a full-time CTO?

// dimension Harvey / CoCounsel Full-time CTO hire Knight CTO
where data lives Vendor cloud servers Your infrastructure Your machine, on-device
ABA Rule 1.6 posture Vendor processes privileged data Internal control Architecture-level safe
annual cost (10-attorney firm) $144k-$288k ($1.2k/user/mo) $280k-$500k+ base + equity $10k-$130k depending on tier
time to first value 3-6 months onboarding 3-6 months recruiting + ramp 6 weeks, fixed scope
scope AI features only Full CTO function Full CTO function
vendor independence Locked to their platform Internal hire — yours No referral fees, ever
exit cost Lose all data & workflows Severance + replacement search Month-to-month, you own everything
who does the work Account manager + support tier Your CTO + their team Boris, personally

Questions partners ask before signing.

Harvey and CoCounsel are SaaS products — your case files travel to their infrastructure. That is the entire problem they have not solved. Knight CTO builds AI that runs locally on the partner's own machine, so privileged content never leaves the device.

The only outbound traffic is to Anthropic under their commercial DPA with no data retention. This architecture removes the ABA Rule 1.6 exposure that prevents most firms from using legal AI at all.

Pasting privileged client data into a third-party AI tool that retains, trains on, or otherwise processes that data on its own infrastructure can violate the duty of confidentiality under ABA Model Rule 1.6 and corresponding state rules including California Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6.

Knight Legal AI runs on the partner's own machine. Document processing, indexing, retrieval, and drafting all happen on-device. Calls to Anthropic occur under their commercial DPA with zero data retention. Every firm should still review the architecture with their ethics counsel — that review is included in the engagement.

Knight CTO publishes four fixed prices. A $1,500 Diagnostic (90-minute audit, 10-page written report, applied to any signed retainer within 30 days). A $9,800 Knight Legal AI Deployment (one-time install plus $600 per month support). A $24,000+ Bespoke Build (six-to-twelve-week scoped engagement). And a $9,500 per month Fractional CTO Retainer for ongoing strategic leadership.

No hourly billing. No referral fees from vendors. No surprise invoices.

Diagnostic engagements start within five business days of signature. Knight Legal AI Deployment ships in six weeks total — two weeks of discovery and architecture, four weeks of build with weekly demos, one week for deployment, training, and handover. Bespoke builds run six to twelve weeks depending on scope.

Replies to intake requests go out within one business day. If we both agree it is a fit, we sign within a week.

AI is one of eight domains. The full CTO function covers practice modernization (migration off legacy stacks, practice management, document management, billing, e-signature), vendor diligence (independent evaluation of every tool the firm pays for), security and compliance (ABA 1.6 / 5.3 oversight, encryption, breach response, SOC 2 readiness), cloud and infrastructure (AWS, Azure, on-prem strategy, disaster recovery), custom integrations (Clio to QuickBooks to DocuSign to calendar), engineering hiring (technical interviews, reference calls, comp benchmarking), and a three-year strategic roadmap presented to the partnership.

No. Knight CTO does not accept referral fees, kickbacks, partner commissions, or any other payment from vendors recommended to clients. Independence is the entire value of vendor diligence. Any conflict of interest is disclosed in writing before a recommendation is made.

Boris Knight does every piece of work personally. No subcontractors, no junior consultants, no white-labeled vendor products. If you engage Knight CTO, you have his mobile number and a working system within ninety days.

Maximum three active engagements at any time. When the slots are full, the website says so.

You own everything. Full source code, deployment scripts, runbook, and a one-hour training session for your team. Four weeks of post-launch monitoring is included. After that, you can manage the system internally or sign a flat monthly support plan.

No vendor lock-in. No per-seat fees. No perpetual license. Retainers are month-to-month after the first quarter.

Working tools your firm can adopt tomorrow. Free.

// no email required  ·  no newsletter signup  ·  free for any firm to use, customize, distribute internally

knight_legal_ai — built for one attorney, now installed across his practice.

// SPEC_01 · DEPLOYMENT_ENVIRONMENT [ON_DEVICE]
// build_time 6 weeks
// files_indexed 3,200+
// cost_per_query $0.04 avg
// time_saved ~12 hr/wk

The brief.

A solo family-law attorney needed to query thousands of pages of case files in plain English. Existing tools required uploading client material to vendor servers — a non-starter under California Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6.

We built a local-first system. The AI runs on his MacBook. Document processing, indexing, retrieval, drafting — all on the device. The only outbound traffic is to Anthropic under their commercial DPA, with no data retention.

Result: a 932-line trial examination guide, generated from the full case record with page-and-line citations, in five minutes for $2.80 in API cost. The same work used to take a paralegal three days. He now uses it daily.

knight_legal_ai — vinokur_matter
$query: Find every contradiction in the Petitioner's income declarations.
[OK] search_documents() · 3,247 chunks · 1.2s
[OK] read_document() · FL-150_2024.pdf · pp.3-5
Three material contradictions identified: FL-150 (3/14/24, p.4, l.12) states monthly income $4,500; declaration filed 7/22/24, p.2, l.7-9 states $7,200; bank deposits produced under RFP No. 14 show $11,400 average monthly inflows over the same period.
$stop_reason: end_turn · tokens_used: 4,712 · cost: $0.04

One person. End to end. No juniors, no handoff.

BK // portrait_pending

Boris Knight. Twenty years building production systems for regulated industries. MBA from the Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley. Operator who codes, ships, and stays in the room when the architecture decisions get hard.

I built Knight Legal AI because my own family-law attorney asked for it, and nothing on the market could meet the duty of confidentiality. What started as a favor became a methodology — one I now bring to every firm that engages me.

I work with a small number of firms at a time. I do not subcontract, I do not white-label someone else's product, and I do not bill for slide decks. If we engage, you have my mobile number and a working system within ninety days.

20+// yrs_engineering
Haas// uc_berkeley_mba
$0// subcontracted
3// max_clients
// CLIENT_FEEDBACK · 009
"He delivered a working system that respects every line of Rule 1.6. I open it before my coffee. I cannot imagine practicing without it."
Michael R., Esq. family law partner · northern california

If your firm is going to use AI anyway, let's make sure it's defensible.

A 30-minute intake call. No pitch deck. No junior on the line. You describe the problem; I tell you within the hour whether I'm the right fit and what it would cost. If I'm not, I'll point you to someone who is.

schedule_intake()   // boris@knightcto.com · response within 1 business day · 3 active engagements max